Tag Archive | Faith

The Promise of the Father

In Acts 1:4-8 we have the account of Jesus’s last instructions to his followers before his ascension into the Heavens. I think I would have been heartbroken had I been there. It’s so easy for us to overlook these words with such candor. Okay, so now these folks had to make the decision of waiting in Jerusalem for this promise God made them or go back to their former way of life. We know what happened. Let’s look at this passage starting in verse 1;

Acts 1:1-9
The first account I composed, Theophilus, about all that Jesus began to do and teach, 2 until the day when he was taken up, after he had by the holy spirit given orders (commandments) to the apostles whom He had chosen. 3 To these He also presented Himself alive, after His suffering, by many convincing proofs, appearing to them over a period of forty days, and speaking of the things concerning the kingdom of God. 4 And gathering them together, he commanded them not to leave Jerusalem, but to wait for what the Father had promised, which, he said, you heard of from me (Jesus); 5 for John baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the holy spirit not many days from now.
6 And so when they had come together, they were asking Him, saying, "Lord, is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?" 7 He said to them, "It is not for you to know times or epochs which the Father has fixed by His own authority; 8 but you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be my witnesses (martus, martyrs) both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and even to the remotest part of the earth. "
NASB

So, what was this promise that the apostles had heard about from Jesus that they were going to receive from the Father? Let’s take a look at this word promise and see what it really means.

Strong's
NT:1860
epaggelia (ep-ang-el-ee'-ah); from NT:1861; an announcement (for information, assent or pledge; especially a divine assurance of good):
Thayer's
1. announcement: 1 John 1:5
2. promise
a. the act of promising, a promise given or to be given: Acts 23:21
b. by metonymy, a promised good or blessing Gal 3:22

It is used 52 times and practically always translated as promise. Here is the very first usage:

Luke 24:44-49
And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.

45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,

46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day:

47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.

48 And ye are witnesses of these things.

49 And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued (clothed with) with power from on high.
KJV

Next up:
Acts 2:38-39
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift (dorea) of the Holy Ghost.

39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
KJV

Are you called?
NT:4341 proskaleoo, proskaloo:
to call to;
to call to oneself; to bid to come to oneself:
a. properly: Matt 10:1
b. metaphorically, Acts 2:39
(from Thayer's Greek Lexicon)

This word called or call is not used anywhere in the epistles. It isn’t used after Acts 23:23 until James 5:14. The word is made up of 2 words, pros and kaleo. Pros is a preposition of direction, like toward or forward. Kaleo, is to call or invite. For the purpose of this study we will look at the following verses:

Rom 8:29-30
29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.
30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called, (kaleo): and whom he called (kaleo), them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
KJV

This begs the question, is there a difference in these callings? I was as surprised as anyone to see the limited us of proskaleoo. Bob can tell us more, but what I found in Vine’s was that proskaleo is only used in the middle voice! Vine’s gives us examples, like Mt. 10:1, Acts 5:40 and James 5:14.

Matt 10:1
And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples,
Acts 5:40
And to him they agreed: and when they had called the apostles,
James 5:14
Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church;
KJV
Fred called Bob on the phone to say hi.
FSW

Proskaleo can also mean the divine call in entrusting men with the preaching of the gospel,” Acts 13:2; 16:10.

Acts 13:2b
…….separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them.
Acts 16:9-10
And a vision appeared to Paul in the night; There stood a man of Macedonia, and prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us.10 And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavored to go into Macedonia, assuredly gathering that the Lord had called us for to preach the gospel unto them.
KJV

Kaleo, as a verb, on the other hand means:

 NT:2564), 
derived from the root kal—, whence Eng. "call" and "clamor" (see B and C, below), is used (a) with a personal object, "to call anyone, invite, summon," e. g., Matt 20:8; 25:14; it is used particularly of the divine call to partake of the blessings of redemption, e. g., Rom 8:30; 1 Cor 1:9; 1 Thess 2:12; Heb 9:15; cf. B and C, below; (b) of nomenclature or vocation, "to call by a name, to name"; in the passive voice, "to be called by a name, to bear a name." Thus it suggests either vocation or destination; the context determines which, e. g., Rom 9:25-26; "surname," in Acts 15:37, KJV, is incorrect (RV, "was called").
(from Vine's Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words, Copyright © 1985, Thomas Nelson Publishers.)

B. Noun.
klesis
, NT:2821), "a calling" (akin to A, No. 1), is always used in the NT of that "calling" the origin, nature and destiny of which are heavenly (the idea of invitation being implied); it is used especially of God's invitation to man to accept the benefits of salvation, Rom 11:29; 1 Cor 1:26; 7:20 (said there of the condition in which the "calling" finds one); Eph 1:18, "His calling"; Phil 3:14, the "high calling"; 2 Thess 1:11 and 2 Peter 1:10, "your calling"; 2 Tim 1:9, a "holy calling"; Heb 3:1, a "heavenly calling"; Eph 4:1, "the calling wherewith ye were called"; 4:4, "in one hope of your calling."
(from Vine's Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words, Copyright © 1985, Thomas Nelson Publishers.)
Rom 11:29
29 for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
NASB
1 Cor 1:26
For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble;
NASB

C. Adjective.

kletos NT:2822),
"called, invited," is used, (a) "of the call of the gospel," Matt 20:16; 22:14, not there "an effectual call," as in the Epistles, Rom 1:1,6-7; 8:28; 1 Cor 1:2,24; Jude 1; Rev 17:14; in Rom 1:7 and 1 Cor 1:2 the meaning is "saints by calling"; (b) of "an appointment to apostleship," Rom 1:1; 1 Cor 1:1.
(from Vine's Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words, Copyright © 1985, Thomas Nelson Publishers.)

Prior to Romans 11:29 Klesis is not used. After Acts 23:23, with the exception of James 5:14, Proskaleo is not used. Is this significant? I think so. I think the calling in the Promise of the Father to the 12 apostles, et al, is different than our calling. #1 Jesus didn’t know about the secret, nor that he wasn’t returning right away. I do believe that what took place on Pentecost was what was promised by God, but certainly not what Peter said it was pertaining to Joel. The question I have, is was this event, on that Pentecost, the promise of the Father to a group of Jews, also the beginning of the Assembly of God? I mean there is no specific record of any Gentiles being saved that day. I have no problem either way, but my 2nd question is if this was the beginning of the Assembly of God, why aren’t we doing what they did:

Acts 2:44-47
44 And all those who had believed were together, and had all things in common; 45 and they began selling their property and possessions, and were sharing them with all, as anyone might have need. 46 And day by day continuing with one mind in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of heart, 47 praising God, and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved.
NASB

This sharing of all things continued through Acts 5:1-11 with the record of Ananias and Sapphira. here is verse 11 is where we have the first actual use of ekklesia, assembly:

Acts 5:11
And great fear came upon the whole ekklesia, and upon all who heard of these things.
NASB

verse 14 goes on to say

Acts 5:14-15
And all the more believers in the Lord, multitudes of men and women, were constantly added to their number;
NASB

When looking at this verse in an Interlinear it appears that it can be understand like this:

Acts 5:14
And believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women.)
KJV

Acts 5:14
(and the more were believers added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women,)
YLT

Acts 5:14
and believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of them and women;
ASV

Then we have Stephen testifying, from Abraham forward, the entirety of chapter 7, concluding with his death.

Acts 8:1-4

8 And Saul was assenting to his death, and there came in that day a great persecution upon the assembly in Jerusalem, all also were scattered abroad in the regions of Judea and Samaria, except the apostles;

2 and devout men carried away Stephen, and made great lamentation over him;

3 and Saul was making havoc of the assembly, into every house entering, and haling men and women, was giving them up to prison;

4 they then indeed, having been scattered, went abroad proclaiming good news — the word.
YLT

Acts 8:40
But Philip found himself at Azotus; and as he passed through he kept preaching the gospel to all the cities, until he came to Caesarea.
NASB

Here we are, practically in Acts 9, and Philip is still teaching “the gospel.” What gospel was he teaching? It wasn’t the gospel of the secret because no one knew it yet. Would it be going to far to say he was teaching the gospel to the Jews; that which was taught them by their Jewish Messiah? Is it plausible to believe that these incredible believer’s, our forefather’s in the gospel, belong to a group other than the Assembly of God, made up of saved Jews and Gentiles? According to Luke they could have been called the Little Flock:

Luke 12:32-34
Fear not, little flock, (poimnion, a group of believers); for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom. Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth. 34 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. KJV

Acts 20:28-29
Take heed therefore to yourselves, and to all the flock (poimnion), wherein the Holy Spirit has set you as overseers, to shepherd (to tend to like a shepherd would which includes feeding) the Assembly of God, which He has purchased with the blood of his own. [For] I know [this,] that there will come in amongst you after my departure grievous wolves, not sparing the flock; Darby

Acts 20:28-29
Be careful for yourselves and for all the people the Holy Spirit has given to you to care for. You must be like shepherds to the Assembly of God, which he bought with the death of his own son. NCV

…….that he obtained with the death of his own Son. NRSV

1 Peter 5:1-4

5 The elders which [are] among you I exhort, who [am their] fellow-elder and witness (martus) of the sufferings of the Christ, who also [am] partaker of the glory about to be revealed:

2 shepherd the flock of God which [is] among you, exercising oversight, not by necessity, but willingly; not for base gain, but readily;

3 not as lording it over your possessions, but being models for the flock.

4 And when the chief shepherd is manifested ye shall receive the unfading crown of glory.
Darby

Let’s see what Vine’s Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words has to say:

NT:4168 FLOCK

  1. poimne (poi/mnh , NT:17), 4167), akin to poimen, “a shepherd,” denotes “a flock” (properly, of sheep), Matt 26:31; Luke 2:8; 1 Cor 9:7; metaphorically, of Christ’s followers, John 10:16, RV, for the erroneous KJV, “fold.” What characterizes Christ’s sheep is listening to His voice, and the “flock” must be one as He is one.
  2. poimnion (poi/mnion, NT:4168), possibly a diminutive of No. 1, is used in the NT only metaphorically, of a group of Christ’s disciples, Luke 12:32; of local churches cared for by elders, Acts 20:28,29; 1 Peter 5:2,3.
    (from Copyright © 1985, Thomas Nelson Publishers.)

Here this group of believer’s is said to belong to “the way:” Acts 9:2 ……so that if he found any belonging to the Way, NASB

Now here is something I almost missed; the very first usage of hagios,40, as saints since Matthew:

Acts 9:13
Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem. KJV

The only thing we know of that he wreaked havoc with was the Assembly of God. Here is the first time hagios is used referring to living believers!

The word hagios in Matt 27:52 refers to dead believers:
And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
KJV

Is this significant? I don’t know but I think it is interesting that this is the first place in Acts where hagios is not referring the Holy, hagios, Ghost.

Then we have Saul’s conversion and him being sent away to Tarsus.

Acts 9:31
The assemblies then throughout the whole of Judaea and Galilee and Samaria had peace, being edified and walking in the fear of the Lord, and were increased through the comfort of the Holy Spirit.
Darby

Soon after this we have the 2nd usage of hagios:

Acts 9:32 Now it came to pass that Peter, passing through all [quarters], descended also to the saints, believers, who inhabited Lydda.
Darby

Now, the 3rd usage:

Acts 9:41
And he gave her his hand, and lifted her up, and when he had called the saints and widows, presented her alive.
KJV

Turns out “saints” is nothing new to call believers:

Deut 33:1-3
And this is the blessing, wherewith Moses, the man of God, blessed the children of Israel before his death.2 And he said, The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; He shined forth from mount Paran, and he came with ten thousands of saints: from his right hand went a fiery law for them.3 Yea, he loved the people; all his saints are in thy hand: and they sat down at thy feet; every one shall receive of thy words. KJV

Ps 149:1
Praise ye the Lord. Sing unto the Lord a new song, and his praise in the congregation, assembly, of saints. KJV

In chapter 10 we have Peter being sent to a Gentile Household to be saved. Prior to this, there is no record of any saints being anyone but former Jews.

Acts 10:44-46
While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.
KJV

Things to consider:

Is there any difference between the “little flock,” in Lk. 12:32 and the flock of Acts 20:28?

Since flock is used metaphorically as a group of believers is there any reason not to consider them as members of the Assembly (formerly Church) of God, even though that phrase isn’t used until Acts 20?

Let’s take another look at Luke 12 where Jesus is talking to the Jewish people:

Luke 12:29-34
‘And ye — seek not what ye may eat, or what ye may drink, and be not in suspense, 30 for all these things do the nations (ethnos, non-Jewish) of the world seek after, and your Father hath known that ye have need of these things;31 but, seek ye the reign of God, and all these things shall be added to you.32 ‘Fear not, little flock, because your Father did delight to give you the reign;33 sell your goods, and give alms, make to yourselves bags that become not old, a treasure unfailing in the heavens, where thief doth not come near, nor moth destroy; 34 for where your treasure is, there also your heart will be.
YLT

Who are these folks who God gave the reign in the Kingdom? They weren’t Christian believer’s at the time that they were given this reign. Were they a special group of believer’s, outside of the Assembly of God?

Is there any significance to the first mention of individual believer’s being called saints, hagios, for the first time in Acts 9? Formerly all we had was a mention of a group of believer’s called a flock, which if it were not for it being a metaphor, we would be sheep, B-b-b-a-a-a-h-h-h!

This Promise of the Father—-to the Jews—-did it carry through to the Gentiles as well? It appears so in Acts 10.

We have said that the “Church,” the Assembly of God, was a part of the secret. Or Christianity was the secret. If that is true and the Secret had yet to be revealed, how can anyone who believed prior to this be a member of something that didn’t exist? Is it retroactive?

THE ASSEMBLY OF GOD

When a friend of mine first introduced the idea of Jesus building his Church in heaven and not on the earth, and then highlighted that the church here should be called the Church of God according to the Christian Scriptures, it motivated me to look for that scripture that we all know so well, ”the Lord added to the Church daily….”   Here we have it in the beloved KJV that most of us grew up on:

Acts 2:47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved. KJV  

If Jesus’s Church is in Heaven, how could he be adding to it daily here on earth? (This deserves a pause for answers). Could the answer be just a matter of Translation? Let’s see what a more accurate translation says:

Acts 2:47 praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved. NASU  

Now that we have found a conflict between the 2 translations, what do we do? If we have a Greek Interlinear, we go look to see what it says. It says <church> 846 (Strong’s Number) auto, the same, as in all the people.
So, ekklesia, 1577, which we all have been taught means church, does not exist in Acts 2:47. (The sideways carrot marks < > generally indicated that what is between them is not in the texts, as is the case here).   To me this posed quite a quandary! Where do I go from here? Another formerly held belief shattered to smitherenes! So what’s left to do, look up ekklesia.

Here is what it means according to Thayer’s Greek Lexicon:   “a gathering of citizens called out from their homes into some public place; an assembly.” What we don’t see, is the word ”church,” as any part of the definition. What we do see, predominantly, is ”Assembly.”  

Now we will look at Young’s Literal Translation of a few verses containing ekklesia:

Matt 16:18 ‘And I also say to thee, that thou art a rock, and upon this rock I will build my assembly, and gates of Hades shall not prevail against it;

Acts 5:11 11 and great fear came upon all the assembly, and upon all who heard these things.

Eph 1:22-23 22 and all things He did put under his feet, and did give him — head over all things to the assembly, 23 which is his body, the fulness of Him who is filling the all in all,  

Not in one verse of 114 scriptures where ekklesia is used, does the YLT translate it Church!   You might be asking yourself, ”If ekklesia doesn’t mean Church, then what the heck, if anything, does?” Good question.  

Etymology of the word Church
The etymology of the word “church” is a complex and multifaceted topic. Based on the provided search results, here is a summary of the key findings: Greek origins: The English word “church” is ultimately derived from the Greek adjective “kuriakos” (κυριακός), meaning “of (or belonging to) the Lord”. This adjective is found only twice in the New Testament, in 1 Corinthians 11:20 and Revelation 1:10, referring to the Lord’s supper and the Lord’s day, respectively.    
1 Cor 11:20
Therefore when you meet together, it is not to eat the Lord’s Supper,
The Lord’s is the word NT:2960 kuriakos (koo-ree-ak-os’); from NT:2962, kurios; belonging to the Lord (Jehovah or Jesus):
(Biblesoft’s New Exhaustive Strong’s Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary. Copyright © 1994, 2003, 2006 Biblesoft, Inc. and International Bible Translators, Inc.)

Rev 1:10-11
I was in the spirit on the Lord’s day, and I heard behind me a loud voice like the sound of a trumpet, NASU

Much like we have eliminated Old Testament and New Testament from our vocabulary, I think it is time to eliminate “Church” as well! If as close as we can come to it, is a transliteration of kuriakos, we have a pretty weak case for using it at all.

Transliteration vs. Translation:

The word “church” is a transliteration of the Greek “kuriakos,” rather than a translation of its meaning into English. This means that the word “church” does not accurately convey the original Greek concept.
Substitution for ekklēsia: In English translations of the New Testament, the word “church” substitutes for the Greek noun “ekklēsia” (ἐκκλησία), which occurs 114 times in the Greek New Testament. This substitution obscures the original meaning of “ekklēsia”, which refers to the gathering or assembly of believers.
 
Alternative etymologies:

Some sources propose alternative etymologies for the word “church”, including:
Connection to the name “Circe”, a sorceress-goddess from Greek mythology, which is unlikely and lacks historical evidence.
Derivation from the Old English “circe” or “cyrc”, which is related to the Dutch “kerk” and German “Kirche”, ultimately tracing back to the Greek phrase “kuriakon doma” (Lord’s house).
Architectural significance: The term “church” has also been associated with the architectural design of Christian buildings, particularly in traditional Christian architecture, where the plan view forms a Christian cross.”

I am of the opinion that what exists in the Hebrew Scriptures should set the precedence for the Christian Scriptures. For example, Church doesn’t exist in the Hebrew Scriptures any more than resurrection does. But what does exist is qahal — OT:6951 an assembly, a company, a congregation, a convocation

a)    an assembly for evil counsel, for war or invasion, for religious purposes Ex. 12:6

b)    a company (used of returning exiles) Ez. 38:15

c)    a congregation as an organized body Joel 2:16

(from The Online Bible Thayer’s Greek Lexicon and Brown Driver & Briggs Hebrew Lexicon, Copyright © 1993, Woodside Bible Fellowship, Ontario, Canada. Licensed from the Institute for Creation Research.)

Deut 31:30 Then Moses spoke in the hearing of all the assembly of Israel the words of this song, until they were complete: NASU

Judg 20:2 And the chief of all the people, even of all the tribes of Israel, presented themselves in the assembly of the people of God, four hundred thousand footmen that drew sword. KJV

Qahal is used 123 times in the Hebrew Scriptures, coming close to the 114 of ekklesia!

Other usages of Assembly in the Hebrew Scriptures:

5712, edah, 149 times

6116, atsarah, 11 times

5475, cowd, 21 times Job 15:8, 29:4 the secret of God; Ps. 89:7 the assembly of the saints!

4186, mowshab, 44 times

4150, mowed/moed, 223 times Is. 41:13 Mount of Assembly

1 Cor 10:31-32
Whether, then, ye eat, or drink, or do anything, do all to the glory of God;

32 become offenceless, both to Jews and Greeks, and to the assembly of God;
YLT

I know it’s going to be difficultfor us to stop using the word Church when it comes to a group of believer’s, but you can still call the buildings, churches. Otherwise, the Body of Christ is the Assembly of God.

Is Your Faith Blind? Give it some Sight (Insight)!

I believe most Christians would say, when asked, if they believed the Bible literally, “Yes., of course I do.” The fact is, it is not completely literal. There are over 212 different kinds of Figures of Speech. Here are some definitions of a figure of speech:

a word or phrase used in a nonliteral sense to add rhetorical force to a spoken or written passage.

a form of expression (as a simile or metaphor) used to convey meaning or heighten effect often by comparing or identifying one thing with another that has a meaning or connotation familiar to the reader or listener

An expression that uses language in a nonliteral way, such as a metaphor or synecdoche, or in a structured or unusual way, such as anaphora or chiasmus, or that employs sounds, such as alliteration or assonance, to achieve a rhetorical effect.

an expression in which words are used in a nonliteral sense, as in metaphor, or in an unusual construction, as in antithesis, or for their sounds, as in onomatopoeia, to suggest vivid images or to heighten effect.

     E.W. Bullinger says in his Companion Bible, “Ignorance of Figures of speech has led to the grossest errors, which have been caused either from taking literally what is figurative, or from taking figuratively what is literal.”

     In the Gospels, Jesus spoke in many Parables. Parables or Parabola, is one such figure, an extended simile. Look for the message beyond the nonliteral story being told. In Matthew 13:1-52 Jesus tells a lot of parables which cannot be taken literally, like that of The Sower, Tares Among Wheat, The Mustard Seed, The Leaven, Hidden Treasure, A Costly Pearl and The Kingdom of Heaven.

     There are 31 usages of the word “parable” and 16 of parable(s) in the Gospels. Luke chapters 12-21 are full of parables. In addition, there are many other figures of speech within the Parables. In look 12:32, Jesus refers to Herod as a fox. This is one of my favorite figures, hypocatastasis, an implied resemblance or representation. This same figure is used in Genesis 3 where Satan is referred to as a serpent; It no more means a snake than it does in Ge. 49:17 where Dan is called the same.

     My favorite Parable for the sake of this teaching is The Rich Man and Lazarus in Luke 16:19. Taking verses 19-31 literal is one of the grossest errors Bullinger referred to. Lazarus was not carried away by angels to Abraham’s bosom when he died. The rich man was not in Hades being tormented, after he died. He did not see Lazarus in Abraham’s bosom far away. Yet, I have personally been told by many brothers and sisters in Christ that this is proof that Christians go to Heaven immediately after they die and sinners go to Hell. Nothing could be further from the truth!

     The point of this parable is given in the final verses:

Luke 16:29-31
“But Abraham said, (he didn’t really say anything, he’s dead)’They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.’ 30 “But he said, ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!’ 31 “But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.(like me, Jesus)‘”
NASU

ARE YOU LISTENING?

Seek Grow Love

Growing Throughout the Year

Talmidimblogging

Biblical postings, Talmidim- meaning students

Age To Come

The Lord Jesus Christ is the last Adam, not the first God-man.

Belgian Biblestudents - Belgische Bijbelstudenten

An other Christian WordPress.com site - Een andere Christelijke WordPress.com site